diptam
07-01 03:59 PM
'Department of Homeland Security'
But if you have put USCIS - dont pull your hairs. You are still okay.
This should be "Department of Homeland Security" per Attorney.
But if you have put USCIS - dont pull your hairs. You are still okay.
This should be "Department of Homeland Security" per Attorney.
wallpaper announced that Elijah Wood
Prashanthi
08-19 12:53 PM
Hi all
I have I-140 approved from Company A . Company B applied for my H1B extn based on Company A's approved I-140 and got 3 years extension till 2011.
My question:
can I switch to company C now and get 3 more years extension again.? My I-140(company A) has not been revoked and priority date is not current.I want to start my PERM only after joining company C .
Thanks in advance .
Yes you can get an extension with Company C based on your approved I-140 as long as it is not revoked.
I have I-140 approved from Company A . Company B applied for my H1B extn based on Company A's approved I-140 and got 3 years extension till 2011.
My question:
can I switch to company C now and get 3 more years extension again.? My I-140(company A) has not been revoked and priority date is not current.I want to start my PERM only after joining company C .
Thanks in advance .
Yes you can get an extension with Company C based on your approved I-140 as long as it is not revoked.
veni001
07-20 05:57 PM
Since the current job requirement is bachelor, your employer can not file GC in EB2.:o
Hi All,
First off, thank you for taking the time read this.
Now I did see a lot of discussions around this topic but could not get a real answer to my situation, Can someone please help me understand this better.
Currently working for the same employer who started my GC process, Labour applied and approved in Sep 06, I-40 approved in 2007, 485 pending. I'm with the employer for 6 years now. I have a masters degree (MCA) but the job does not require a masters when I joined. I have my bachelors (both 3yr degrees from India). I have close to 10 years of professional experience.
Do I qualify for the port, assuming my job does not require masters degree. Thank you all in advance.
Hi All,
First off, thank you for taking the time read this.
Now I did see a lot of discussions around this topic but could not get a real answer to my situation, Can someone please help me understand this better.
Currently working for the same employer who started my GC process, Labour applied and approved in Sep 06, I-40 approved in 2007, 485 pending. I'm with the employer for 6 years now. I have a masters degree (MCA) but the job does not require a masters when I joined. I have my bachelors (both 3yr degrees from India). I have close to 10 years of professional experience.
Do I qualify for the port, assuming my job does not require masters degree. Thank you all in advance.
2011 Elijah Wood, coming to a TV
ponnuswamyp
09-28 12:21 AM
I am not sure whether a way to prepone it. You can try going for FP. They did not say anything about the future date.
more...
kittu07in
09-24 09:53 PM
I believe, USCIS website was updated on Sep 21st 2009.
My Priority date is Jun 2006 and applied in EB3 category.
I got an email on Sep 22nd 2009 from USCIS saying "Document mailed to applicant". When I see online status, it is "Document production or Oath Ceremony".
I called twice USCIS to confirm it. But they are saying "According to online status the document was already sent to your current address".
I am in a situation to beleive it or not? to celebrate it or not.... :-( .....
And one more thing is "I got EAD before my marriage and I haven't added my wife to I485"?
If I get GC, how to add my wife to GC? is it possible? what is her status right now?
Thanks in advance...
My Priority date is Jun 2006 and applied in EB3 category.
I got an email on Sep 22nd 2009 from USCIS saying "Document mailed to applicant". When I see online status, it is "Document production or Oath Ceremony".
I called twice USCIS to confirm it. But they are saying "According to online status the document was already sent to your current address".
I am in a situation to beleive it or not? to celebrate it or not.... :-( .....
And one more thing is "I got EAD before my marriage and I haven't added my wife to I485"?
If I get GC, how to add my wife to GC? is it possible? what is her status right now?
Thanks in advance...
webm
05-13 10:54 AM
I got my GC but my wife's application (based on my 485) is still pending. I think at this point I can switch jobs/go to school full time and it won't affect my spouse's case. Just want to double check on this, any thoughts??
__________________
How come EB3 India, PD Jul 2003 (NSC) got approved?? Am i missing here??
__________________
How come EB3 India, PD Jul 2003 (NSC) got approved?? Am i missing here??
more...
Roger Binny
02-09 03:55 AM
Sorry to hear the situation.
As you know if you can find another job based on H1 then no problem in porting your H1 to a new employer,now being in feb april is 50 days away so hope for best.
In this situation, yes, legal advice is preferred, relying info on the forums is never a right idea when it comes to a situation where stakes are high.
If there is any option of changing to H4 now and switching back to H1 later and pick the GC process where it was left before then that would be an ideal scenario, only an experienced attorney can answer this, hence the legal advice option.
Compared to H4, over stay may cause more trouble for now and later in AOS.
PS: My 2 cents and i'm not an attorney.
As you know if you can find another job based on H1 then no problem in porting your H1 to a new employer,now being in feb april is 50 days away so hope for best.
In this situation, yes, legal advice is preferred, relying info on the forums is never a right idea when it comes to a situation where stakes are high.
If there is any option of changing to H4 now and switching back to H1 later and pick the GC process where it was left before then that would be an ideal scenario, only an experienced attorney can answer this, hence the legal advice option.
Compared to H4, over stay may cause more trouble for now and later in AOS.
PS: My 2 cents and i'm not an attorney.
2010 Tagged: Elijah Wood, Fight For
devd
09-11 04:17 PM
Thanks for the reply,
Can i call USCIS or it should only be attorney or some authorized persons?
I agree, Online status is unreliable, but the recent update about undeliverable looks quite straight forward.
Can i call USCIS or it should only be attorney or some authorized persons?
I agree, Online status is unreliable, but the recent update about undeliverable looks quite straight forward.
more...
swetha00
09-12 02:43 PM
Hi all!
Thanks a lot for the information...
Thanks a lot for the information...
hair Elijah wood
Blog Feeds
02-15 09:30 PM
AILA Leadership Has Just Posted the Following:
Just when we thought it was safe to go back in the immigration waters again. Transparency, we were promised it. One year into the new administration, however, it remains an elusive concept. That is it did, until yesterday. Yesterday, I saw a poster at the CIS that revealed exactly how the agency views immigration lawyers. It was a poster of small fish in the water being stalked by a large shark. I walked past it and literally did a comic book like double take.
Underneath in comparatively small letters there is a caption that warns people to protect themselves against those who are not authorized to help them. There was no indication or explanation, however, of what that could mean, other than the picture of giant shark.
The subliminal message was both clear and offensive. I dare the agency to say I am reading too much into it. Google �metaphors and similes.� Nine times out of ten the definition includes a lawyer shark comparison/example. Couple this with the daily reports we receive where our clients are told �why do you have a lawyer, your lawyer knows nothing.�
Contrary to the government�s implication, however, immigration lawyers are not predatory. The bulk of immigration lawyers I know, and I know a lot of them, literally agonize over the fates of their clients. They spend hours upon hours trying to assist them through a labyrinth of inconsistent rules, regulations (when we actually get them) and guidance.
AILA works hard to combat immigration fraud and the unauthorized practice of law. It also does all it can to educate 15,000 immigration lawyers about both the law and ethics.
I agree that immigrants need to be wary of perpetrators of immigration fraud. The government, however, should warn of the true predators - those practicing law without a license. Its posters should identify who those individuals are and provide warnings or information calculated to educate about unscrupulous practices. Simply, a broad statement below an icon typically used to vilify attorneys does nothing of the sort.
I am not sure how to depict the government�s purported message in its elaborate seascape. Perhaps a tidal wave depicting millions being thrown back indiscriminately on foreign shores or a lamprey latched onto an unsuspecting gentle manatee. I need to think about it. I take metaphors seriously as they �are dangerous and are not to be trifled with.� Please remove the posters immediately.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7473844792018103725?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/02/troubled-waters.html)
Just when we thought it was safe to go back in the immigration waters again. Transparency, we were promised it. One year into the new administration, however, it remains an elusive concept. That is it did, until yesterday. Yesterday, I saw a poster at the CIS that revealed exactly how the agency views immigration lawyers. It was a poster of small fish in the water being stalked by a large shark. I walked past it and literally did a comic book like double take.
Underneath in comparatively small letters there is a caption that warns people to protect themselves against those who are not authorized to help them. There was no indication or explanation, however, of what that could mean, other than the picture of giant shark.
The subliminal message was both clear and offensive. I dare the agency to say I am reading too much into it. Google �metaphors and similes.� Nine times out of ten the definition includes a lawyer shark comparison/example. Couple this with the daily reports we receive where our clients are told �why do you have a lawyer, your lawyer knows nothing.�
Contrary to the government�s implication, however, immigration lawyers are not predatory. The bulk of immigration lawyers I know, and I know a lot of them, literally agonize over the fates of their clients. They spend hours upon hours trying to assist them through a labyrinth of inconsistent rules, regulations (when we actually get them) and guidance.
AILA works hard to combat immigration fraud and the unauthorized practice of law. It also does all it can to educate 15,000 immigration lawyers about both the law and ethics.
I agree that immigrants need to be wary of perpetrators of immigration fraud. The government, however, should warn of the true predators - those practicing law without a license. Its posters should identify who those individuals are and provide warnings or information calculated to educate about unscrupulous practices. Simply, a broad statement below an icon typically used to vilify attorneys does nothing of the sort.
I am not sure how to depict the government�s purported message in its elaborate seascape. Perhaps a tidal wave depicting millions being thrown back indiscriminately on foreign shores or a lamprey latched onto an unsuspecting gentle manatee. I need to think about it. I take metaphors seriously as they �are dangerous and are not to be trifled with.� Please remove the posters immediately.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/186823568153827945-7473844792018103725?l=ailaleadership.blogspot.com
More... (http://ailaleadership.blogspot.com/2010/02/troubled-waters.html)
more...
cr52401
03-02 09:29 PM
It really help if you are close to end of the time. I got it in 2 weeks.
hot Elijah Wood Wilfred cotton
saravanaraj.sathya
07-25 12:45 PM
I think we should make this thready a sticky so that everyone could reply.
more...
house Elijah Wood Wilfred cotton
vnsriv
11-14 11:52 AM
Hello everyone,
Please shed some light on this
I am going to a different Application Support Center than the one in my notice.
I am trying to locate the Application Support Center (ASC) close to where I live. Is there any information about the location of all the ASCs through out the country in the USCIS site?
If no how should I find/locate the nearest ASC to where I live?
The address of the ASC in my notice is in a different place. I want to go to the one that is near to where I live.
Thanks in Advance
Google it
Please shed some light on this
I am going to a different Application Support Center than the one in my notice.
I am trying to locate the Application Support Center (ASC) close to where I live. Is there any information about the location of all the ASCs through out the country in the USCIS site?
If no how should I find/locate the nearest ASC to where I live?
The address of the ASC in my notice is in a different place. I want to go to the one that is near to where I live.
Thanks in Advance
Google it
tattoo Wilfred, Elijah Wood
senthilnathank
10-07 04:54 PM
No. But the employer can file for 1 Year extension if there was a Labour or PERM was filed and it's pending. If I140 is approved and waiting for I485, employer can file for 3 year extension.
more...
pictures Elijah Wood amp; Jason Gann Film
desi3933
02-26 01:24 PM
What is the expiration date for her current H-4 I-94?
dresses starring Elijah Wood,
gcpool
04-19 05:27 AM
I dont think we are doing any wrong here. I think it helps people. People can search who are the H1B and GC sponsoring companies. You can search about lawyers who have filed H1B and Green Cards.
more...
makeup Elijah Wood and Jason Gann in
solaris27
03-14 08:52 AM
your brother have 2 year left in his engg , ask him to keep these prrof and if possible letter from collage .
he should be okay .
he should be okay .
girlfriend Elijah Wood Wilfred cotton
agiridhar
05-14 08:23 AM
When the tech companies/competeamerica.org are bragging that retrogression is anti competitive and severely constraining the growth of the techies/employees, why can�t an antitrust lawsuit stand good in US courts?
Can somebody shed more light on this and explain why any lawsuit wont work against retrogression and/or for issue of EAD after I-140 approval, when retrogression is anti-competitive.
Can somebody shed more light on this and explain why any lawsuit wont work against retrogression and/or for issue of EAD after I-140 approval, when retrogression is anti-competitive.
hairstyles Elijah Wood Elijah Wood and
PALLO
04-15 05:02 PM
It is not EB1, It is for EB2.
arunmohan
02-13 12:40 AM
Guys,
we are going to do another brainstorming session on the country quota issue this sunday 02/15/2009.
Please PM me to get Conference Call details.
Thanks
Please join the conference call.
Date: 02/15/2009
Time:8:00 PM(EST)
Please PM me or mirage for details.
we are going to do another brainstorming session on the country quota issue this sunday 02/15/2009.
Please PM me to get Conference Call details.
Thanks
Please join the conference call.
Date: 02/15/2009
Time:8:00 PM(EST)
Please PM me or mirage for details.
immiblues
02-11 12:20 PM
Did you declare your arrest record at the time of I-485 filing and did INS respond to that? What stage of I-485 filinga are you? Do you already have your AP?
As far as I know you can be denied entry IF your I-484 is denied while you are out of the country.
As far as I know you can be denied entry IF your I-484 is denied while you are out of the country.
0 comments:
Post a Comment